Twikup logo
Twikup
US Justice Department Challenges Apple-Epic Contempt Ruling at Supreme Court

US Justice Department Challenges Apple-Epic Contempt Ruling at Supreme Court

By Akshay SatijaEditor in ChiefSeptember 22, 2026Updated September 22, 20263 min read
Today
#Apple#Epic Games#Apple vs Epic Games#US Supreme Court#Supreme Court#Justice Department#DOJ#App Store

Reader highlight

Key Takeaways

1

The Justice Department filed an amicus brief supporting neither Apple nor Epic Games.

2

The DOJ wants the Supreme Court to clarify the standard for civil contempt involving alleged violations of injunctions.

3

The government says there is a fair ground of doubt over Apple’s 27% commission on certain off-app purchases.

DOJ Challenges Civil Contempt Standard

The Justice Department’s filing focuses on when a party can be held in civil contempt for allegedly violating an injunction.

The government argues that civil contempt should be appropriate only when the defendant’s conduct is clearly covered by the express terms of the injunction, reasonably interpreted in context.

The DOJ also points to the “fair ground of doubt” standard, arguing that contempt should not be imposed when there is genuine uncertainty over whether the conduct violated a court order.

The government is asking the Supreme Court to clarify how lower courts should apply this standard.

Apple and Epic Games Legal Dispute

Epic Games sued Apple in 2020, alleging that Apple’s control over App Store transactions violated antitrust law.

The case resulted in an injunction requiring changes to certain Apple App Store practices. Epic later accused Apple of violating that order after Apple introduced a 27% commission on certain off-app purchases.

The lower court subsequently found Apple in civil contempt in April 2025.

Apple has denied violating the injunction and appealed the contempt ruling to the Supreme Court.

DOJ Takes Different Positions on the Dispute

The Justice Department is not simply supporting Apple in the case.

Regarding Apple’s 27% commission on certain off-app purchases, the DOJ says there is a fair ground of doubt about whether that conduct violated the injunction.

The government takes a different position on the requirement involving buttons and links. According to the DOJ’s analysis, the injunction expressly required Apple to allow both “buttons” and “links,” making that issue different from the commission dispute.

The government therefore asks the Supreme Court to apply the relevant contempt standard to the separate issues rather than treating the entire dispute in the same way.

Supreme Court to Consider Apple’s Appeal

The Supreme Court agreed in June 2026 to hear Apple’s challenge to the contempt ruling. The case is listed as Apple Inc. v. Epic Games Inc., No. 25-1311.

The Supreme Court docket shows that Apple filed its opening merits brief on September 14, 2026, followed by the United States’ amicus brief on September 21.

The case remains pending before the Supreme Court.

The DOJ filing makes clear that the United States is participating as an amicus and is supporting neither Apple nor Epic Games overall. Its arguments instead focus on how courts should determine whether conduct clearly violates an injunction and when civil contempt is appropriate.

Sources

The U.S. Justice Department has urged the Supreme Court to clarify when civil contempt can be imposed in Apple’s dispute with Epic Games. The government says contempt should require a clear violation of an injunction’s express terms and has asked the Court to clarify the “fair ground of doubt” standard for lower courts.

Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ

What is the Apple-Epic Games Supreme Court case about?

The case concerns Apple’s challenge to a civil contempt ruling arising from an injunction issued during its legal dispute with Epic Games.

What did the U.S. Justice Department file?

The Justice Department filed an amicus brief titled “Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Neither Party.”

Is the DOJ supporting Apple?

Not overall. The government explicitly filed its brief in support of neither Apple nor Epic Games, although some of its arguments address issues that could benefit Apple.

What is the “fair ground of doubt” standard?

It refers to the principle that civil contempt should not be imposed when there is a genuine fair ground of doubt about whether a party violated a court order.

What is the status of the Apple-Epic case?

The case is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court under case number 25-1311.

Twikup on WhatsApp

Essential stories, sent directly to you.

Follow the Twikup channel for breaking news and important updates—without another crowded inbox.

Follow Twikup